The Limits of AI in Investing:

Human Intelligence Still Wins in Finance’s Final Frontier

While tech evangelists tout AI supremacy, a defiant voice in the Philippines’ capital reminds us that judgment still beats the algorithm—intuition, discipline, and story.

“AI isn’t your golden ticket. But it will accelerate your losses.”

That was the provocative opener at his standing-room-only keynote at the University of the Philippines’ amphitheater—and it landed like a thunderclap.

Before him were Asia’s brightest young minds—rising economists, AI researchers, and budding asset managers from Asia’s top universities.

Plazo—venture strategist, AI architect, and CEO of Plazo Sullivan Roche—delivered a dose of realism on what AI delivers—and fails to grasp in actual investing.

And what it still lacks, he stressed, is think like a human.

### Beyond the Hype: Investing in the Age of Overpromised Intelligence

Dressed in a razor-sharp outfit, Plazo commanded the stage with surgical precision.

He started boldly with a short video montage—social media influencers promising 90% win rates. Then he paused.

“I engineered what they now sell as magic,” he said, dryly.

The crowd chuckled—but ego wasn’t the point.

The message? AI is retrospective, not prophetic.

“You can’t outsource conviction. AI doesn’t feel in a trade—it reacts what already happened.”

“When war breaks out, when Powell frowns during a Fed announcement, when a bank goes under—AI doesn’t flinch. Humans do.”

### The Students Who Challenged Him—and Got Schooled

The highlight of the talk? A battle of brains and bots.

A student from NUS presented an AI-backed trade on the Nikkei—technically solid, sentiment-scanned, and data-rich.

Plazo studied it. Then said:

“Solid—but blind to central bank footprints. Your AI doesn’t read motive. It consumes noise.”

The audience leaned in. The student grinned. Then: applause.

Another moment: A robotics PhD from Kyoto asked if quantum computing would render all current models useless.

Plazo’s answer? “Yes—and no. Faster chips won’t purge panic from data. Train an read more AI on fear, and it’ll become panic on steroids.”

### The Three Myths Plazo Shattered in 45 Minutes

1. **“AI Will Replace Portfolio Managers.”**
Nope. AI supports—it crunches, optimizes, and speeds up decisions—but it doesn’t see through fog-of-war events.

2. **“AI Understands Fundamentals.”**
Wrong. AI reads tables, but fails at narrative causality. It may model interest rates, but it can’t predict a Strait of Hormuz conflict.

3. **“AI Makes You Smarter.”**
Actually, it might weaken your edge. “The real risk isn’t AI itself,” Plazo warned. “It’s deskilling ourselves at scale.”

### Why Asia Paid Close Attention

This wasn’t a TED-style pep talk.

Asia’s universities are now minting billion-dollar fund builders. They’re asking: more code, or more conscience?

Plazo’s call: “Code, but think critically.”

In closed-door chats at Ateneo and a roundtable at AIM, professors debated what they called a clarion call.

One finance dean remarked candidly, “He just reset our compass. Not magic—mirror.”

### The Future AI Can Build

Despite the truth bombs, Plazo isn’t against innovation.

He’s building models that read psychology as well as numbers—fusing bias detection and central bank logic.

His stance? “Co-pilot AI. Don’t worship it.”

“AI doesn’t need more data. It needs discernment. And that still lives in humans.”

The crowd rose as one. And his message is still moving in Asia’s halls of learning.

In a world drunk on AI hype, Joseph Plazo offered something rare: intelligence that’s still human.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *